What UHC pays for 90837 in Texas — and why there's no LCSW-only number
UHC's Texas master's-level contracted rate for 90837 is approximately ~$110 at the median. One structural detail makes this distribution unusual: the 25th percentile and the median fall at the same value, meaning many LCSWs sit at the floor of UHC's range rather than in the middle of it. The spread above the median is where differentiation appears — and where your contracted rate sits inside that spread decides whether a rate-review letter is worth writing.
| Payer | p25 | Median | p75 |
|---|---|---|---|
| UnitedHealthcare | $110 | ||
| BCBS Texas | $110 | ||
| Cigna | $96 | ||
| Aetna | $136 |
Full distribution (p10–p90), sample sizes, and confidence scores available in the complete report.
Unlock full data →UHC doesn't file LCSW-specific contracted rates for individual psychotherapy codes. That's not a gap — it's how UHC structures its fee schedule. LCSWs, LPCs, and LMFTs are contracted on the same master's-level tier for 90837 in Texas, which means the published master's-level distribution is the right comparison for your rate. Since July 2022, UHC has been required to publish that distribution monthly under the federal Transparency in Coverage rule.
What is the Transparency in Coverage rule?
The Transparency in Coverage rule (45 CFR Part 147) requires payers to publish their contracted rates monthly. RateScope builds from those filings — see the methodology page for how.
Why your LCSW rate is read against LPCs and LMFTs too
UHC's Texas fee schedule for individual psychotherapy groups licensed professional counselors (LPC), licensed clinical social workers (LCSW), and licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFT) at the same contracted rate tier for 90837. The licensing paths are different — LCSW comes through clinical social work training, LPC through counseling, LMFT through marriage and family therapy — but UHC treats all three as master's-level independent practitioners for this code. Psychologists (PhD and PsyD) sit on a separate, usually higher tier.
Because UHC contracts all three master's-level credentials at comparable rates, the combined group gives you a larger and more stable comparison cohort than an LCSW-only slice would. Your LCSW contract is compared against the full master's-level distribution — LCSWs, LPCs, and LMFTs together. For the purpose of reading where your rate sits, that group is the right reference.
Where does your rate sit against UHC's Texas 90837 distribution?
Pull your most recent UHC contract or remittance advice and find the 90837 contracted rate. That's the number you're comparing.
The page shows UHC's Texas master's-level 90837 distribution in three tiers: the median (the midpoint of all UHC Texas master's-level 90837 contracts), the middle range (roughly the 25th to 75th percentile, where most contracts land), and the sample size. Compare your rate against those markers.
If your rate sits above the 75th percentile, you're contracted stronger than three-quarters of UHC's Texas master's-level group for this code. A rate-review conversation is probably not worth your time — you're already on the strong end of UHC's own schedule. If your rate is below the 25th percentile, you're in the bottom quarter of what UHC is currently contracting comparable Texas therapists for 90837. That's the position where a rate-review letter has something specific to cite. Inside the middle range, your contract is typical — worth watching across annual review cycles, but probably not the priority this quarter.
When does a rate-review letter have something to cite with UHC?
If your rate is below the 25th percentile of UHC's Texas master's-level 90837 distribution, here's what a rate-review letter can say:
I'm in-network with UHC for CPT 90837 at [your contracted rate]. UHC's own Transparency in Coverage filing for Texas shows that rate sits below the 25th percentile of its Texas master's-level (LCSW/LPC/LMFT) contracted distribution for this code. I'd like to request a rate review aligned closer to the median, timed to the upcoming annual review cycle.
That letter cites the payer's own published data, asks for a percentile movement rather than a dollar figure, and ties the request to the annual review cycle — which gives UHC's credentialing and contracting team a procedural reason to process it. It doesn't guarantee a rate change. UHC negotiates individually, and factors like your panel tenure, caseload, geography, and no-show rate influence where within their schedule they'll land. But the letter has a citation, a specific ask, and a hook.
What UHC's contracted rate doesn't promise
The published distribution shows UHC's contracted rates — the ceiling of what UHC has agreed to pay per claim. What UHC actually pays per claim after downcoding, denials, EAP routing, and modifier adjustments can be lower. Two LCSWs with identical contracted 90837 rates in the same Texas metro can see different realized reimbursement depending on claim flow. The contracted-rate benchmark is the right tool for a panel or rate-review decision. It's a starting point, not a realized revenue guarantee.
What's visible before you buy
The master's-level credential filter, sample size, confidence score, and methodology are all shown on the UHC Texas 90837 page before purchase. If UHC's Texas master's-level cohort for 90837 is too thin to support a stable read, the page flags it and the confidence score drops accordingly. The full report adds geographic breakdowns within Texas — Dallas, Houston, Austin, and San Antonio cohorts — and the underlying per-NPI data.